Marco Exams for Clinical Laboratories

Marco Exams enriches laboratory reports with evidence-based clinical interpretation, differentiating the lab by the quality and depth of its reports. It processes genetic, pathological, and molecular results and adds diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic context to each report.

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Some answers to questions we often receive

How does a laboratory integrate Marco Exams into its workflow?

Marco Exams connects to the lab's LIMS via API. When the technical result is ready, Marco automatically generates the clinical interpretation layer with no additional manual intervention.

Can the laboratory customize the report format?

Yes. Marco Exams allows configuring the report template with the laboratory's brand, included fields, and level of clinical detail according to each client's needs.

How does Marco Exams stay current with new variants and approved biomarkers?

Marco Exams continuously updates its knowledge base with newly clinically relevant variants, FDA/EMA-approved biomarkers, and updated reporting guidelines, with no intervention required from the laboratory team.

Does Marco Exams comply with international genomic reporting standards?

Marco Exams reports follow the ACMG/AMP variant classification standards and the biomarker reporting guidelines of ESMO, NCCN, and CAP.

Can Marco Exams handle the report volume of a high-capacity laboratory?

Yes. Marco Exams is designed to process large volumes of reports concurrently, automatically scaling to the lab's demand without affecting turnaround times.

Can the laboratory offer Marco Exams as a differentiated service to its medical clients?

Yes. Laboratories can position Marco Exams-enriched reports as a value-added service for physicians, hospitals, and clinics, differentiating themselves from competitors through the depth of clinical interpretation.

Talk to a specialist

Let's create the future together

Oncology genomics labs want to differentiate themselves by delivering reports with greater clinical value, but lack the medical resources to write personalized clinical interpretations for each patient.